Climate campaigners win Heathrow expansion case

Controversial plans for a third runway at Heathrow Airport have been thrown into doubt after a court ruling. The government’s decision to allow the expansion was unlawful because it did not take climate commitments into account, the Court of Appeal said. Heathrow said it would challenge the decision, but the government said it would not appeal.

The judges said that in future, a third runway could go ahead, as long as it fits with the UK’s climate policy. The case was brought by environmental groups, councils and the Mayor of London. There were “whoops and jumps of jubilation from environmentalists outside the court room” after the judgement, BBC environment analyst Roger Harrabin reported.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps tweeted that the government would not appeal against the ruling. In an interview, he said that it was “for Heathrow and the courts to decide” whether the expansion should go ahead. “This government is absolutely committed [from] the Prime Minister down to airport expansion, but, we want to make sure that expansion is environmentally friendly,” he said.

Heathrow chief executive John Holland-Kaye said the airport would challenge the court’s decision at the Supreme Court, saying: “We think the appeals court got it wrong”. “We have a very strong legal case, and we will be making that very firmly,” he said. He said in the meantime Heathrow would work with government on a review of its policy “to make sure we can demonstrate expansion is compatible with the Paris accord on climate change”. “I’m confident that this issue is fixable, and we can work with the government to get on and deliver the expanded Heathrow that Britain needs,” Mr Holland-Kaye added. “Without Heathrow expansion, there will be no global Britain.”